The transcript of this hearing has not been provided.

Summary:

When asked if I was guilty or not I responded “no jurisdiction”. I asked for a jury, and reminded them that “no man can judge in his own cause” and that I had two causes against them: (i) the challenge to their jurisdiction, and (ii) the brochures accusing them (The 5th Gibraltar Messenger Newsletter gibraltar-messenger.net/thelaw/vote-for-christ-and-gods-perfect-law-of-liberty/).

They refused a jury, said they had jurisdiction, and would apply their “law”, which I said was “legislation”, not Law.

I said I could prove that I was British, which they said I could do at the final hearing (See 3rd March 2016 hearing – it wasn’t the final one).